Using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), we present a genome-wide screening of a mixed mesenchymal-epithelial hepatoblastoma, its recurrence and 2 novel hepatoblastoma cell lines raised from the ascites, 18 (HepU1) and 23 (HepU2) months after diagnosis of a hepatoblastoma in a 35-month-old boy. Both cell lines were also characterized by GTG-banding, multicolor-fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) and multicolor banding (M-Band). On the basis of CGH, we compared the cytogenetics of histologically different tumor areas of the parental tumor and its recurrence with the hepatoblastoma cell lines. We found different CGH profiles in the parental tumor rev ish enh(1q31-q32,8p,12,17,20,X), dim(4q34-q35,18q23)[cp] and its recurrence rev ish enh(8q24,17,Xq26-q28), dim(7q11.2-q21,13q34)[cp]. Although both epithelial cell lines were obtained at different times and the clonal ancestor of HepU2 had been exposed to a higher cumulative dose of chemotherapy, HepU1 and HepU2 have an identical karyotype: 48-56,XY,+Y,dup(2)(q32-q34),t(3;4)(q21;q34),+8,+12,+13, +17,+t(18;19)(q21;q?),+20[cp] and identical CGH profiles: rev ish enh(2q24-q33,8,12,13q,17,20), dim(4q34-q35,18q22-q23). In common with previously described hepatoblastoma cell lines, HepU1 and HepU2 demonstrate a gain of chromosome 20. The in situ aberrations most closely resembling that of HepU1 and HepU2 were found in areas of fetal-embryonal differentiation of the primary tumor. Interestingly, both cell lines mimic this histology in their three-dimensional growth pattern in vitro. HepU1 and HepU2 are thus cytogenetically and phenotypically highly characteristic of fetal-embryonal hepatoblastoma.

We report a 13-year-old female patient with multiple congenital abnormalities (microcephaly, facial dysmorphism, anteverted dysplastic ears and postaxial hexadactyly), mental retardation, and adipose-gigantism. Ultrasonography revealed no signs of a heart defect or renal abnormalities. She showed no speech development and suffered from a behavioural disorder. CNS abnormalities were excluded by cerebral MRI. Initial cytogenetic studies by Giemsa banding revealed an aberrant karyotype involving three chromosomes, t(2;4;11). By high resolution banding and multicolour fluoresence in-situ hybridisation (M-FISH, MCB), chromosome 1 was also found to be involved in the complex chromosomal aberrations, confirming the karyotype 46,XX,t(2;11;4).ish t(1;4;2;11)(q43;q21.1;p12-p13.1;p14.1). To the best of our knowledge no patient has been previously described with such a complex translocation involving 4 chromosomes. This case demonstrates that conventional chromosome banding techniques such as Giemsa banding are not always sufficient to characterise complex chromosomal abnormalities. Only by the additional utilisation of molecular cytogenetic techniques could the complexity of the present chromosomal rearrangements and the origin of the involved chromosomal material be detected. Further molecular genetic studies will be performed to clarify the chromosomal breakpoints potentially responsible for the observed clinical symptoms. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates that multicolour-fluorescence in-situ hybridisation studies should be performed in patients with congenital abnormalities and suspected aberrant karyotypes in addition to conventional Giemsa banding.

A 54-year-old male presented with a spontaneous peroneal nerve palsy and a diagnosis of monophasic synovial sarcoma (SS) was rendered by histologic examination. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a complex abnormal karyotype without evidence of the typical t(X;18)(p11;q11) associated with SS. Subsequent reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis showed the presence of an SYT/SSX2 fusion transcript, confirming the presence of a cyptic t(X;18). In light of -X, -18 and marker chromosomes evident in the G-band karyotype, it was suspected that a cryptic chromosomal rearrangement involving the marker chromosomes would harbor an X;18 fusion. Multi-colored karytotyping (M-FISH) revealed a previously unrecognized t(X;18) and t(5;19) in the marker chromosomes as well as unrecognized ins(6;18) and t(16;20). The addition of M-FISH analysis in this case led to the identification of complex inter-chromosomal rearrangements, thus providing an accurate karyotype.

All molecular alterations that lead to breast cancer are not precisely known. We are evaluating the frequency and consequences of reciprocal translocations in breast cancer. We surveyed 15 mammary cell lines by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH). We identified nine apparently reciprocal translocations. Using mBanding FISH and FISH with selected YAC clones, we identified the breakpoints for four of them, and cloned the t(3;20)(p14;p11) found in the BrCa-MZ-02 cell line. We found that the breakpoint targets the potential tumor-suppressor gene FHIT (fragile histidine triad) in the FRA3B region; it is accompanied by homozygous deletion of exon 5 of the gene and absence of functional FHIT and fusion transcripts, which leads to the loss of FHIT protein expression. Additional experiments using comparative genomic hybridization provided further information on the genomic context in which the t(3;20)(p14;p11) reciprocal translocation was found.

Rearrangements of 12p, resulting from deletions or translocations, are common findings in hematologic malignancies. In many cases, these rearrangements target the ETV6 gene (previously called TEL) located at 12p13. Various partner genes have been implicated in the formation of fusion genes with ETV6. These include PDGFRB, JAK2, NTRK3, ABL2, and ABL1, each of which encodes for proteins with tyrosine kinase activity. To date, ETV6/ABL1 transcripts have been detected in only four patients with a leukemic disorder. Here, we describe one adult with chronic myeloid leukemia and a child with T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia with ETV6/ABL1. Molecular cytogenetic analysis confirmed that formation of an ETV6/ABL1 fusion in these patients required at least three chromosomal breaks and showed that each of these translocations is the result of a complex chromosomal rearrangement. Molecular analysis showed the presence of two fusion transcripts in both patients as the result of alternative splicing, questioning the suggested role of these transcripts in the lineage specificity. Clinical findings of these patients were compared to those of previously reported cases, and the possible clinical and biological similarities between ETV6/ABL1 and other fusion genes leading to increased tyrosine kinase activity are discussed.